Archive for the 'Crossbows' Category

Crossbows no different than compound bows

Monday, March 9th, 2009

by Gary Sales

I really enjoy your paper.
About the crossbows — I don’t kill any more deer shooting a crossbow than I did when I shot a compound bow. You still have to have patience and also know where your bow is shooting and you still have to have a shooting lane. (more…)

An open letter to Bill Cooper

Monday, November 17th, 2008
Bill -
As I see it, this crossbow criticism business goes back to your taking up gigging frogs. If you’d gone back to the primitive method of grabbing bullfrogs by hand, like I suggested several years ago, you’d have painted yourself as a purist with lasting effect.
It’s not about doing things the hard way versus the easy way; it’s about making it (more…)

They can kiss my lasagna

Saturday, November 15th, 2008

By Don Rathert

Emery,

Just a short note to elaborate on the reason I had to go to a crossbow.
You can’t get a permit for hunting with one unless one or two M.D.s write a letter of partial disability. Thank God, the Missouri Conservation Dept. is compassionate enough to give we unfortunates permits to use the weapon hence allowing me and others to continue to partake in hunting deer during bow season. I’ve had two shoulder surgeries, two knee surgeries and a back surgery that is still an ongoing chronic problem at times. (more…)

1. There were no conspiracies 2. Compound bows more potent than crossbows

Friday, October 31st, 2008

By Tim Huffman

As a writer of one of the controversial crossbow articles, I would like to address the letters to the editor in the last issue. First, “crossbows” was on the list of stories put out by the editor that had been requested by readers for Traveler. I had experience so chose that subject not knowing that my friend Bill Cooper was also writing a similar article or that the editor would challenge bowhunters to respond. Both were fine with me but there were no conspiracies. (more…)

Freedom of speech, press and choice apply to crossbows, too

Friday, October 31st, 2008

By Bill Cooper

In my 35 years as an outdoor writer, never have I been the victim of libel until the response of one individual to my crossbow article in the September issue of the Traveler. Libel is a written or printed statement tending to injure a person’s reputation unjustly. This individual strayed far from the issues at hand to attack my reputation and integrity in news print. I totally agree with Editor Styron that it is sad when people who disagree with a point choose to ignore facts as stated and instead attack a person’s integrity. This individual went so far as to cancel his subscription, maybe in hopes of getting me fired. (more…)

If story missed mark, so did respondents

Tuesday, October 14th, 2008

Dear Emory,

If the crossbow story missed the mark so did the respondents. First permit
me an explanation.

I am 66 years old. I built my first bow from a hickory limb, bailer twine
string, early in the Korean War. Around the end of that war an older cousin
from St. Louis gave me a self bow he had made as a shop project. Wow, a real bow. I thought I had arrived. (more…)

Cooper responds to critics

Sunday, October 12th, 2008

It was with great interest that I read criticisms of the crossbow hunting article I wrote in last month’s Traveler. Of particular interest to me is Mr. Goodman’s assessment of me and the editor of Traveler, Emery Styron.

Mr. Goodman suggested that the article material was unfit to be printed. Must I remind him that this is the United States of America, where freedom of speech and freedom of press are two of our dearest rights under the U. S. Constitution? I intend to continue both for as long as I breathe. (more…)

Bowhunting intended to be challenging

Sunday, October 12th, 2008

To the Editor,
It was with great disappointment that I read Mr. Cooper’s article about crossbows that you saw fit to publish in your magazine. Mr. Cooper obviously wants to take as many shortcuts as it takes to get an easy deer during bow season. Mr. Cooper wants to skip all of the hours of practice that is necessary to become proficient with a bow and instead rely on a crossbow and his misplaced rangefinder, and then has the nerve to sling mud at the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) for denying him and everyone like him the chance to take the easy way out. (more…)

Leave crossbows for truly disabled

Sunday, October 12th, 2008

Dear Editor,
I for one am opposed to allowing the use of the crossbow in archery season except for those who have a true disability and cannot shoot a bow.
Both writers mentioned the fact of crossbows being heavy and awkward to use and store, but we are led to believe they will be able to be used by women and children? By the time they are able to handle a heavy crossbow, with a little practice they should be able to draw and accurately shoot a bow. You do not need to shoot a high poundage bow to take a deer. (more…)

Crossbows, inline muzzleloaders are not primitive weapons

Sunday, October 12th, 2008

I have been informed that you are pushing for the expansion of the use of the crossbow in Missouri to more than the handicapped. This is just plain wrong.
Archery season was meant to be a primitive equipment sport from the start. Then the Allen compound bow came on the scene and was allowed to be used as a bow. No one ever thought the compound bow would evolve from the original Allen (piece of junk) to the state it has today when it was first allowed. (more…)


Traveler Home How to Subscribe Trading Post Guides and Outfitters Useful Links Photo Gallery About Traveler