<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>riverhillstraveler.com Blog &#187; Hunting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/index.php/category/hunting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog</link>
	<description>News and comment about the Missouri Outdoors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:43:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Spring Turkey finals in: 44,713 birds taken</title>
		<link>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/05/13/spring-turkey-finals-in-44713-bird-taken/</link>
		<comments>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/05/13/spring-turkey-finals-in-44713-bird-taken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDC Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/05/13/spring-turkey-finals-in-44713-bird-taken/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Missouri&#8217;s 21-day regular spring turkey season closed with 41,830 checked. This was 3.7 percent fewer than  2008.
Top harvest counties for the three-week season were Franklin with 915, Texas with 839 and St. Clair with 678. Regional harvest totals were: Central, 6,311; Southwest, 6,129; Northwest, 5,820; Ozarks, 5,671; Northeast, 5,472; Kansas City, 4,801; Southeast, 4,197; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missouri&#8217;s 21-day regular spring turkey season closed with 41,830 checked. This was 3.7 percent fewer than  2008.<span id="more-246"></span><br />
Top harvest counties for the three-week season were Franklin with 915, Texas with 839 and St. Clair with 678. Regional harvest totals were: Central, 6,311; Southwest, 6,129; Northwest, 5,820; Ozarks, 5,671; Northeast, 5,472; Kansas City, 4,801; Southeast, 4,197; and St. Louis, 3,430.<br />
Hunters 15 and younger checked 2,883 turkeys during the youth spring turkey season April 4 and 5. This, brought the overall spring turkey harvest to 44,713. The record spring turkey harvest, including the youth and regular seasons, occurred in 2004, when hunters checked 60,744 turkeys.<br />
The Conservation Department recorded four firearms-related turkey hunting incidents during the regular turkey season. One was fatal and involved a 56-year-old man pulling a loaded shotgun from his vehicle by the barrel. He was struck in the chest when the trigger caught on an object, causing the gun to discharge. The other three incidents involved shooters who either mistook victims for game or fired at movement.  (From Jim Low/MDC news release.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/05/13/spring-turkey-finals-in-44713-bird-taken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waterfowl hunters spent $900 million in 2006</title>
		<link>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/04/12/waterfowl-hunters-spent-900-million-in-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/04/12/waterfowl-hunters-spent-900-million-in-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outdoor News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/04/12/waterfowl-hunters-spent-900-million-in-2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Waterfowl hunters spent $900 million on a variety of goods and services from food, transportation, guns and decoys to hunting dogs, clothing and other incidental expenses in 2006, according to a new report issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.These trip and equipment-related expenditures generated more than $2.3 billion in total economic output for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waterfowl hunters spent $900 million on a variety of goods and services from food, transportation, guns and decoys to hunting dogs, clothing and other incidental expenses in 2006, according to a new report issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.<span id="more-199"></span>These trip and equipment-related expenditures generated more than $2.3 billion in total economic output for 2006, which resulted in $157 million in federal and state tax revenues, supported more than 27,000 jobs, and generated more than $8.5 million in employment income.</p>
<p>The report, The Economic Impact of Waterfowl Hunting in the United States, is an addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. The report shows more than 1.3 million people, 16 years of age and older, hunted waterfowl in 2006.  Waterfowl hunters represented 10 percent of all hunters, 7 percent of all hunting trip-related expenditures, and 6 percent of all equipment expenditures.</p>
<p>According to the report, waterfowl hunters tend to be younger, have higher educational achievements, and are more affluent compared to all hunters. The</p>
<p>The National Survey, conducted every five years, since 1955, is one of the nation&#8217;s most definitive sources of information concerning wildlife-dependant recreation. The U.S. Census Bureau conducted the survey in two phases. First, a screening interview identified wildlife-related recreationists. The second phase consisted of multiple interviews to collect detailed information on participation and expenditures for U.S. residents 16 years of age and older.</p>
<p>The waterfowl hunting report in addition to the detailed National Survey report, state reports, and other addenda can be downloaded at:  <a href="http://wsfrprograms.fws.gov/Subpages/NationalSurvey/reports2006.html">http://wsfrprograms.fws.gov/Subpages/NationalSurvey/reports2006.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/04/12/waterfowl-hunters-spent-900-million-in-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Spring turkey futures mixed</title>
		<link>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/03/24/2009-spring-turkey-futures-mixed/</link>
		<comments>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/03/24/2009-spring-turkey-futures-mixed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDC Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/03/24/2009-spring-turkey-futures-mixed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

  

Turkey hunters in many parts of Missouri don’t need an expert to tell them the state’s turkey population is down. 
  “I’m hoping that hunters will adopt a two-year strategy,” said Resource Scientist Tom Dailey. Dailey, who oversees the Missouri Department of Conservation’s wild turkey management program, said he expects a significantly smaller [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" /><meta content="Word.Document" name="ProgId" /><meta content="Microsoft Word 11" name="Generator" /><meta content="Microsoft Word 11" name="Originator" /></p>
<link rel="File-List" /><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>  <w:WordDocument>   <w:View>Normal</w:View>   <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>   <w:PunctuationKerning/>   <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>   <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>   <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>   <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>   <w:Compatibility>    <w:BreakWrappedTables/>    <w:SnapToGridInCell/>    <w:WrapTextWithPunct/>    <w:UseAsianBreakRules/>    <w:DontGrowAutofit/>   </w:Compatibility>   <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>  </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>  <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">  </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><br />
<style> <!--  /* Style Definitions */  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-parent:""; 	margin:0pt; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText 	{margin:0pt; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Courier New"; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 	{size:612.0pt 792.0pt; 	margin:72.0pt 65.95pt 72.0pt 65.95pt; 	mso-header-margin:36.0pt; 	mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 	{page:Section1;} --> </style>
<p><!--[if gte mso 10]><br />
<style>  /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0pt; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-ansi-language:#0400; 	mso-fareast-language:#0400; 	mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style>
<p> <![endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Arial">Turkey hunters in many parts of Missouri don’t need an expert to tell them the state’s turkey population is down. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Arial">  “I’m hoping that hunters will adopt a two-year strategy,” said Resource Scientist Tom Dailey. Dailey, who oversees the Missouri Department of Conservation’s wild turkey management program, said he expects a significantly smaller turkey harvest this year than in 2008. Hunters checked 46,000 turkeys in last year’s spring turkey season. He expects the number to be closer to 40,000 this year. Missouri has fewer gobblers this year than it has had in 20 years or so.<span id="more-160"></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Arial">  “Three of the last four years have seen below-average nesting success,” said Dailey. “In fact, the number of poults (recently hatched turkeys) seen in the 2008 survey was a modern record low.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Arial">  Weather records explain turkey hens’ poor success in recent years.  Turkeys’ strong nesting performance three years ago set the stage for a paradoxical 2009 spring turkey season. A strong year-class of three-year-old turkeys means there will be a good supply of big gobblers for hunters to pursue. The bad news is that such gobblers are notoriously gun shy. “Three-year-olds are trophy birds, with big spurs and long beards,” said Dailey, “but it’s the two-year-old toms that gobble so lustily it makes hunters” hair stand on end. A goofy 2-year-old will often run to a hunter’s call gobbling like crazy, but a 3-year-old is likely to sneak in silently, looking for the hen that’s supposed to be making those seductive sounds. Or, he might just stand out in the middle of a field waiting for the hen to come to him. They’re tough customers.” </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Arial">  That, said Dailey, sets up a situation that could perpetuate diminished hunting opportunities. “I hope hunters don’t hammer the jakes on account of a lack of 2-year-olds. This year’s jake is next year’s two-year-old. I’m hoping hunters will focus on quality hunts for older birds and less on just bagging a turkey. The number of jakes already is down in many areas.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Arial">  Asked why the Conservation Commission didn’t put jakes off-limits to hunters this year, Dailey notes that this would penalize hunters in areas where turkeys still are abundant. It also would put an unnecessary burden on hunters, who might have trouble distinguishing between mature and juvenile turkeys. “The recovery of our turkey flock will follow naturally when we get two or three years in a row of favorable nesting conditions,” said Dailey.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Arial">  Northern Missouri has recorded the biggest decline in turkey numbers, but Dailey says that is relative. Northern counties went into the current slump with larger turkey populations than south of the Missouri River. Consequently, many northern counties still will have good hunting.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Arial">“Things were down quite a bit in the north, but there was still more gobbling in the north than in any other part of the state. While hunters in many areas are bracing for lower turkey numbers, many of the people I talk to see no problem whatsoever in their areas.” Dailey noted that Franklin County usually is in the top three turkey harvest counties statewide. He said this east-central Missouri continues to have very strong turkey numbers, and last year’s poult count was good, so he expects the area around Franklin County to have good hunting again this year.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Arial">With a good carry-over of three-year old birds and reduced numbers of 2-year-olds and jakes, Dailey recommends hunters adjust their strategies. He said “patience” and “restraint” are this year’s watchwords “patience for those who want to shoot mature gobblers, and restraint for those who want better hunting next year.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Arial">  ”I think people are going to have to move around more to find birds,” said Dailey. “It’s a balancing act. You don’t want to sit there all morning in a spot where there is no gobbling, but there might be a bird there. Patience is important, but so is knowing when to move. If you’re pretty sure there are turkeys in an area, stay put. Rely less on gobbling response and more on good calling.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Arial">  He said pre-season scouting is the best way to solve this dilemma. “Because there is going to be less gobbling this year, it is going to be more difficult for someone to come into a new area and find birds.  Hunters who put in the time to find those 3-year-old birds and learn their behavior patterns stand a much better chance of getting in a position where they get a shot.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Arial">  This year’s spring turkey season starts April 20 and runs through May 10. The youth season is April 4 and 5. Details of hunting regulations are available in the 2009 Spring Turkey Hunting Information booklet, which is available wherever hunting permits are sold, or at mdc.mo.gov/hunt/turkey/sprturk/.–from MDC sources.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/03/24/2009-spring-turkey-futures-mixed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Bullets in the News</title>
		<link>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/03/04/green-bullets-in-the-news/</link>
		<comments>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/03/04/green-bullets-in-the-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/03/04/green-bullets-in-the-news/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Non-lead shotshells are already the norm in Missouri migratory waterfowl areas. In this article, CNN examines the pros and cons towards green bullets as well.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non-lead shotshells are already the norm in Missouri migratory waterfowl areas. In this article, <a target="_blank" title="Green bullets" href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/science/03/04/green.bullets/index.html">CNN</a> examines the pros and cons towards green bullets as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://riverhillstraveler.com/blog/2009/03/04/green-bullets-in-the-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
